2d 539, 977 N.W.2d 756 PDC No: 2022 WI App 29 - Published OPINION FILED: SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JanuCircuit Waukesha Lloyd Carter JUSTICES: ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ZIEGLER, C.J., ROGGENSACK, DALLET, HAGEDORN, and KAROFSKY, JJ., joined. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at 403 Wis. d/b/a Aurora Medical Center - Summit, Respondent-Appellant. Zingsheim, Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by issuing the temporary injunction without referencing any basis demonstrating that Petitioner had a reasonable probability of success on the merits of 'some type of legal claim.'Ģ023 WI 35 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2021AP1787-FT COMPLETE TITLE: Allen Gahl Attorney in fact, on behalf of his principal, John J. The circuit court issued an order compelling Aurora immediately to enforce the prescription and administer Ivermectin to Patient. Thereafter, Petitioner bright a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Petitioner, who held health care power of attorney for Patient, received a prescription for Ivermectin from a retired OB/GYN, but Aurora declined to effect the prescription. Patient was in Aurora's care when he tested positive for COVID-19. to administer Ivermectin to Petitioner's uncle (Patient), holding that the circuit court abused its discretion in issuing the injunction without analyzing Petitioner's reasonable probability of success on the merits.

The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the court of appeals reversing the circuit court's issuance of an injunction compelling Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Aurora hospital